|
Post by dan on Feb 17, 2012 7:19:46 GMT -7
[This thread will comprise a continuing, open letter to Barbara Marx Hubbard....] Dear Barbara, I am being inspired to write this letter, by my new friend, Lore R. Sam and I had lunch with Lore on Wednesday. Lore, among her many ongoing projects, continues to facilitate the Baltimore Green Forum. We were there to discuss the upcoming meeting, on the 26th...... When I started explaining my concerns to Lore, she immediately mentioned your name, which had been very familiar to me, so I was struggling to come up the name of something you had written. All I could think of was the Aquarian Conspiracy (1980). I call that a Freudian slip. Please allow me to explain the slip....... I can do this by way of a (personal?) chronology...... Think of that popular song from 1967..... This is the dawning of the age..... Your wiki bio lists you as a futurist. That latter entry urges us not to confuse futurists with the Futurism movement. However, the complaint that I, hereby, bring to you is that too many futurists suffer from futurism. Ok, so what is Futurism......? Whenever '-ism' is attached to a word, it is meant to attach an ontological significance to that word. IOW, futurists wish, very emphatically, to distinguish themselves from historicists. Simple, human curiosity leads us to speculate about this apparent denial of history...... When anyone wishes to deny the past, the very first thing that will come to the mind of any normal human is that there must be a skeleton in the closet. No? Barbara..... How many taps on an iPad screen do you think it will take to find the skeleton in the closet of the futurists? I'm guessing that it may take two or three taps, at the most. But, just to play it safe, I'll drop a very big hint.... Evolutionism...... (cont.)
|
|
|
Post by Jake Reason on Feb 17, 2012 10:06:54 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by dan on Feb 17, 2012 10:22:56 GMT -7
Jake refers us to Neale's biography of Barbara Marx Hubbard..... www.poeticmind.co.uk/creative-thoughts/lessons-neale-donald-walsch-mother-invention-legacy-barbara-marx-hubbard-future-of-you-part-1-by-gil-dekel/ .... Wonderful, but now, with Jake's prompting, I have further pinned down the skeleton in Barbara's closet..... It is none other than my old buddy, Thomas Robert. It turns out, historically speaking, that I am not the only one who has been inspired by Thom. My fellow inspiree is none other than my other old friend, Charles Robert. If I were writing a detective story, I think it's fair to say that this is where the plot thickens.... So now you see that we have circled right back to Barbara's problem with history. That problem is to be found in the necessay and logical link between Malthusianism and Darwinism. And, how many skeletons are there in the closet of the Social Darwinists? Yes, the plot does thicken..... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism_and_ideology#Ideological_origins Toward the end of that section, you will see this...... Ouch! I'm being led to wonder, if Barbara forgot to do her Wikipedia homework. Lore inspired me to do this homework for Barbara. Wonderful, so now what....? Clearly, this leads us right back to the Aquarian Conspiracy....... (cont.)
|
|
|
Post by Jake Reason on Feb 17, 2012 13:19:42 GMT -7
Well this Barbara is certainly an 'apple of my eye'.
Interesting 'skeleton closet' there, Dan. But why your attention to the fascist black dress, in the closet? Did you not see the pretty rose crusi dress?
I fail to see any stark difference between the dawning of the Age of Aquarius and the dawning of Millennium Come.
|
|
|
Post by dan on Feb 17, 2012 13:28:33 GMT -7
Jake,
So do I fail to see the difference.
I'm more concerned about our evangelical brethren. They are very skeptical of the New Agers..... and for good reason....
I've just had a long talk with Jim Gray, who is the 2nd newest member of Cy's forum....
(cont.)
|
|
|
Post by Jake Reason on Feb 17, 2012 13:31:30 GMT -7
'Jesus' was a New Ager. He talked about it all the time. An incurable optimist.
|
|
|
Post by dan on Feb 17, 2012 13:34:08 GMT -7
You are right, Jake. Now, please, read Jim's essay..... Jim is the second newest member of Cy's forum. As I'm wont to say, the plot does continue to thicken...... (cont.)
|
|
|
Post by dan on Feb 17, 2012 14:05:52 GMT -7
In the above notes from Jim, please note that Uriel's Machine derives, in part, from Hamlet's Mill. Yes, this is all about the Ancient Wisdom and the Perennial Philosophy. What were they? They were intended to answer our question...... from whence did we come, whither do we go.....? Or, yes, who the heck are we? And this is how my convo with Jim began..... All men are created equal...... Would anyone care to refute this statement? Just to prove this statement, is why I think that I was sent...... This is my mission. My proof is to be found in the Wikipedia..... We are persons...... Very recently, the US Supreme Court has attempted to define Corporations as Persons. I don't think that was a smart move. (cont.)
|
|
|
Post by dan on Feb 17, 2012 14:40:55 GMT -7
Here is a recent communication..... I note that Lore did request partial privacy, and I have already removed some of the personal information. I will quickly remove from this very remote forum any other info that you deem irrelevant to the possible saving of the world.
(cont.)
|
|
|
Post by dan on Feb 17, 2012 15:25:47 GMT -7
This is from my longest time friend, in the whole world. Palmer now lives in Las Cruces. Palmer was my longest employer, on behalf of the City of Baltimore...... And so it goes.....
.
|
|
|
Post by Jake Reason on Feb 17, 2012 20:12:43 GMT -7
Jim is the second newest member of Cy's forum. As I'm wont to say, the plot does continue to thicken...... I write: " Did you not see the pretty rose crusi dress?" .....and then minutes later, (out of left field-removed from the context of this discussion), you post the above from Jim (6equj5)?. hmmm, is this some sort of synchronicity? Though I have no idea for why. anyhow... back to watching Arn: The Knight Templar, with my sauvignon at side. ------------------------ Thank you for Keith's lore to Penny. Yes, 'the wall' is but a veil we wear to shroud the world from our deepest hopes and dreams. Ollie Ollie outs come free
|
|
|
Post by brenatom on Feb 18, 2012 10:25:37 GMT -7
What did you do as our saviour, pray little chicken?
WWCD?
|
|
|
Post by dan on Feb 18, 2012 11:31:49 GMT -7
Ok, let me try this again...... For the time being, however, I will be sticking with this BMH thread, before either returning to the 'Who Do We Think....' thread, or starting with a new topic. I will be taking a broader, historical and philosophical overview of where we are coming from, which, among other things will help us better understand the context for Barbara Marx Hubbard. What we are seeing is an extended transition from the modern to the postmodern. The essential features of modernism were to be found in the Copernican revolution of 1543, which was based on the overthrow of the Ptolemaic cosmology of classical antiquity. Hi Bren...... WWCD...., yes, indeed. I was mainly just looking for a safe harbor, in the storm, and Cy's place is what hove into sight. I'm am feeling a bit relieved by not having those 11,000 posts hanging over my head. It is a bit of a fresh start. I would be very pleased if you would like to join our little conversation here, around the old potbellied stove, used by us wannabe shepherds. --------------- And here I am, wishing to overthrow Copernicus....... per impossible? This possibility is the very last thing on the minds of our postmodern friends. It is simply unimaginable to them. This is the last remnant of modernism, to which they cling for their dear lives. Were they ever to let go of that life-preserver, they know they would be meeting their Maker, for sure. How can we ever turn back the clock on Copernicus? Would that not be the height of folly, nay, insanity? Well, seeing as how I've been certified to be insane, that should be no problem! Instead, the postmodernists content themselves with just nibbling around the edges of modernism. They stay well away from the hardcore or third-rail that is Copernicus. The entire edifice would crumble, and who is going to pick up the pieces? As a result, the postmodernists embrace irrationality and mysticism. These are the mice who play, while the Cat is away. Each one can spin their own little yarns, not fearing that a Metanarrative will ever catch up with them. The New Age movement is a case in point, and BMH is an elder statesman of that movement, and a spokeswoman for the Human Potential movement (HPM) within that broader spectrum. In that wiki entry, the HPM is said to be aligned with Humanistic psychology, and so is located between psychoanalysis and Transpersonal psychology. The New Agers tended to dabble in the Transpersonal, but were reluctant to ever embrace it, except, perhaps, experientially, in the occasional altered state. As an avowed Personalist, what do I make of the transpersonal? Well, I am strongly opposed to Transhumanism, which is another animal, altogether. What I am thinking of are our encounters with the Numinous, an idea not totally apart from Kant's notion of the Noumenal realm. Kant, somewhat after the fashion of Descartes, drove a wedge between the noumenal and the phenomenal realms, thus paving the way for the sensory and analytic orientation of modern philosophy. I would suggest that the Numinous is something akin to the glue that holds the world together. It is embedded in our most mundane experiences, but which we seldom experience in its raw form, wherein it become the mysterium tremendum. The kundalini experience might be another form of it. It is what might also be considered as something hyper-personal. It cuts to the quick of our often fragile psyches. .
|
|
|
Post by skaizlimit on Feb 18, 2012 23:04:42 GMT -7
Very good, Jake; I knew this all the time, but was checking to see if you did.
Some of my ancestors were Masons. My father left me with some Masonic paraphenalia, but a visiting Puerto Rican upon seeing them threw them into the fire place thus destroying them.
But onto the noumenal realm. Seems there is something to it, and it can be uncanny at times.
|
|